<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why URL shortening as we know it is bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.anselmbradford.com/2009/08/17/why-url-shortening-as-we-know-it-is-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.anselmbradford.com/2009/08/17/why-url-shortening-as-we-know-it-is-bad/</link>
	<description>wrangling the Internet's wildest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:07:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ans</title>
		<link>http://blog.anselmbradford.com/2009/08/17/why-url-shortening-as-we-know-it-is-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>Ans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.anselmbradford.com/?p=887#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;d like to devote a whole post to Twitter actually and these kind of issues. Stay tuned! Speaking of open source, one URL shortening service of note is http://kissa.be, whose source is housed at Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/kissabe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;d like to devote a whole post to Twitter actually and these kind of issues. Stay tuned! Speaking of open source, one URL shortening service of note is <a href="http://kissa.be" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/kissa.be?referer=');">http://kissa.be</a>, whose source is housed at Google Code: <a href="http://code.google.com/p/kissabe" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/code.google.com/p/kissabe?referer=');">http://code.google.com/p/kissabe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://blog.anselmbradford.com/2009/08/17/why-url-shortening-as-we-know-it-is-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.anselmbradford.com/?p=887#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>I think about this every time I tweet using a link shortening service. I&#039;d prefer not to use them at all, but the format of Twitter simply requires it more often than not. It seem to me that some open-source algorithm could be created to encode URLs in a more standardized way. Then a key could be created—kind of like in cryptology—where anyone with the key could later decode the short URL into its original longer form. Of course, I guess I should worry more about Twitter disappearing than the URLs in my tweets rotting. If the former happens, the latter won&#039;t matter much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think about this every time I tweet using a link shortening service. I&#8217;d prefer not to use them at all, but the format of Twitter simply requires it more often than not. It seem to me that some open-source algorithm could be created to encode URLs in a more standardized way. Then a key could be created—kind of like in cryptology—where anyone with the key could later decode the short URL into its original longer form. Of course, I guess I should worry more about Twitter disappearing than the URLs in my tweets rotting. If the former happens, the latter won&#8217;t matter much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
